C v H: We acted on behalf of “H” who was the respondent to a Peace and Good Behaviour application by his neighbour “C”.  The factual allegation against “H” was trivial.  We formed the view that “H” should not be put to the expense and time associated with a trial.  We made an application to have the Peace and Good Behaviour application struck out at an early stage.  This was successful.  The Court made comment that if “C” institutes a further Peace and Good Behaviour application we would be in a strong position to seek costs from her.